BMW X5 2023 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2023
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Hybrid | 3.0 Hybrid | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 313 HP | 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 800 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 seconds | 4.9 seconds | |
| BMW X5 engine produces 237 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 350 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Despite less power, BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.1 | 1.6 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X5 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 4430 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 214 mm (8.4 inches) | 273 mm (10.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 647 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1720 litres | 1491 litres | |
| BMW X5 has 147 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 229 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 3`450 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`420 kg | 2`735 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 780 kg | 715 kg | |
| BMW X5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 8 procentiem more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Therefore, BMW X5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 58 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |