BMW X5 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009

 
BMW X5
2013 - 2013
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 381 HP245 HP
Torque: 740 NM600 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 seconds9.3 seconds
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive.
BMW X5 engine produces 136 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.59.2
Real fuel consumption: 12.0 l/100km12.1 l/100km
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW X5 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X5 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 300'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 16 years15 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.78 m
Width: 2.01 m2.00 m
Height: 1.78 m1.78 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW X5 is 7 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 620 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1750 litresno data
Turning diameter: 12.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`8303`175
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 14 80010 200
Pros and Cons: BMW X5 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv