BMW X5 2018 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (BMW X5) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 380 HP | |
| Torque: | 620 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW X5 engine produces 115 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, but torque is 170 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 10.5 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X5 consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 104 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 990 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6, BMW 6 sērija | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW X5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| BMW X5 is 4 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 7 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X5 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1860 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW X5 has 135 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This could mean that the BMW X5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`860 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 52 600 | 53 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |