BMW X5 2018 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (BMW X5) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 400 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 760 NM | 261 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 222 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 499 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 12.2 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X5 consumes 5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 750 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 32 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6, BMW X7 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.87 m | |
|
BMW X5 is larger, but lower. BMW X5 is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 13 cm wider, while the height of BMW X5 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 663 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 645 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 663 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1870 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`010 kg | 2`810 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 51 400 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |