BMW X5 2013 vs BMW X5 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW X5
2013 - 2018
BMW X5
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW X5 2013 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X5 2010 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW X5 2013 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid)3.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 218 - 450 HP245 - 408 HP
Torque: 350 - 740 NM400 - 740 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5 - 8.2 seconds5.4 - 7.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.6 - 10.47.4 - 12.5
BMW X5 2013 petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW X5 2010. On average, BMW X5 2013 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5 2010.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 209 mm (8.2 inches)222 mm (8.7 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X5 2010 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.88 m4.86 m
Width: 1.94 m1.95 m
Height: 1.76 m1.78 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW X5 2013 is 3 cm longer than the BMW X5 2010, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X5 2013 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 650 litres620 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1870 litres1750 litres
BMW X5 2013 has more luggage capacity.
BMW X5 2013 has 30 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5 2010. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 2013 (by 120 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.7 meters12.8 meters
The turning circle of the BMW X5 2013 is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW X5 2010.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`803~ 2`799
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 29 20014 800
Pros and Cons: BMW X5 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
BMW X5 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv