BMW X5 2010 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.4 | 3.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 - 408 HP | 245 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 740 NM | 315 - 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.6 seconds | 6.2 - 9.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 12.5 | 9.2 - 15.0 | |
|
BMW X5 petrol engines consumes on average 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. On average, BMW X5 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 2.12 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| BMW X5 is 7 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 17 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 620 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1750 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`799 | ~ 3`134 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |