BMW X5 2010 vs BMW X5 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW X5
2010 - 2013
BMW X5
2013 - 2018
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW X5 2010 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X5 2013 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW X5 2013 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 3.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel)2.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid)

Performance

Power: 245 - 408 HP218 - 450 HP
Torque: 400 - 740 NM350 - 740 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 - 7.6 seconds5 - 8.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.4 - 12.55.6 - 10.4
BMW X5 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X5 2013. On average, BMW X5 2010 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5 2013.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 222 mm (8.7 inches)209 mm (8.2 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X5 2010 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.88 m
Width: 1.95 m1.94 m
Height: 1.78 m1.76 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW X5 2010 is 3 cm shorter than the BMW X5 2013, 1 cm wider, while the height of BMW X5 2010 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 620 litres650 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1750 litres1870 litres
BMW X5 2013 has more luggage space.
BMW X5 2010 has 30 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5 2013. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 2013 (by 120 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.8 meters12.7 meters
The turning circle of the BMW X5 2010 is 0.1 metres more than that of the BMW X5 2013.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`799~ 2`803
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 14 60029 200
Pros and Cons: BMW X5 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW X5 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv