BMW X5 2007 vs Volvo XC90 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW X5 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC90 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X5 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.8 | 2.4 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 - 355 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 580 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 8.1 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 12.0 | 8.2 - 13.5 | |
|
BMW X5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, BMW X5 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X5 is 4 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 620 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1750 litres | 1837 litres | |
| BMW X5 has 371 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 87 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`753 | ~ 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |