BMW X4 2019 vs Mazda CX-9 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 382 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 495 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW X4 engine produces 151 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.8 | |
| BMW X4 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X4 could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 74 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-9 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 4 sērija | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.75 m | |
|
BMW X4 is smaller. BMW X4 is 32 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X4 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 407 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 407 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 524 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1430 litres | 2017 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 587 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 39 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X4 has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |