BMW X4 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
BMW X4 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X4 engine produces 101 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 180 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power BMW X4 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.1 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X4 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X4 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.71 m | |
|
BMW X4 is larger, but lower. BMW X4 is 6 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 10 cm wider, while the height of BMW X4 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1430 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW X4 has 25 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the BMW X4 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 447 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X4 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means BMW X4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`420 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| BMW X4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than BMW X4, so BMW X4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 37 600 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X4 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |