BMW X4 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW X4 engine produces 40 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Renault Kadjar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Kadjar engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 6 sērija | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
|
BMW X4 is larger. BMW X4 is 26 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1430 litres | 1478 litres | |
| BMW X4 has 53 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 48 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X4 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means BMW X4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`139 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X4 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 37 600 | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X4 has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |