BMW X4 2018 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a more dynamic driving. BMW X4 engine produces 110 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Velar, whereas torque is 300 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Velar. Due to the lower power, BMW X4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X4 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means that by driving the BMW X4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X4 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 6 sērija | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Velar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.67 m | |
|
BMW X4 is smaller. BMW X4 is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, 11 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X4 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 673 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1430 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage space. BMW X4 has 148 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X4 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means BMW X4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 37 600 | 43 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X4 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
| |