BMW X4 2018 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X4 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X4 engine produces 10 HP more power than Jaguar F-Pace, but torque is 30 NM less than Jaguar F-Pace. Thanks to more power BMW X4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X4 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X4 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 6 sērija | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar F-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
| BMW X4 is 2 cm longer than the Jaguar F-Pace, 15 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X4 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1430 litres | 650 litres | |
| BMW X4 has 17 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X4 (by 780 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 400 | 25 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X4 has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |