BMW X4 2018 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X4 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X4 engine produces 10 HP more power than Jaguar F-Pace, but torque is 30 NM less than Jaguar F-Pace. Thanks to more power BMW X4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW X4 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X4 could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X4 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 6 sērija | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar F-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
| BMW X4 is 2 cm longer than the Jaguar F-Pace, 15 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X4 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1430 litres | 650 litres | |
| BMW X4 has 17 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X4 (by 780 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 200 | 25 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X4 has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |