BMW X4 2014 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 360 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 465 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
BMW X4 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X4 engine produces 56 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power BMW X4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.6 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW X4 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the BMW X4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X4 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC60 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X4 2014 3.0 engine: Using poor quality oil on this engine will quickly lead to soot build-up, resulting in damage to the hydrocompensators, Vanos and Valvetronic systems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.71 m | |
| BMW X4 is 3 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X4 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | 1455 litres | |
| BMW X4 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 55 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X4 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X4 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X4 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |