BMW X4 2014 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
BMW X4 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X4 engine produces 27 HP more power than Volvo XC60, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power BMW X4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X4 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the BMW X4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X4 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.71 m | |
| BMW X4 is 3 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X4 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | 1455 litres | |
| BMW X4 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 55 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X4 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`335 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X4 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X4 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |