BMW X4 2014 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X4 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X4 engine produces 6 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power BMW X4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X4 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the BMW X4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X4 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | Used also on Opel Antara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X4 2014 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW X4 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.76 m | |
| BMW X4 and Chevrolet Captiva are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 97 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 97 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 500 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | 1577 litres | |
| In 5-seat version BMW X4 has more luggage space (by 23 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 177 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X4 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means BMW X4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`335 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X4 has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |