BMW X4 2014 vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (BMW X4) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Alfa Romeo Stelvio) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 5.7 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is a more dynamic driving. BMW X4 engine produces 90 HP less power than Alfa Romeo Stelvio, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, BMW X4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X4 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio, which means that by driving the BMW X4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X4 consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| BMW X4 2014 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW X4 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.69 m | |
|
BMW X4 is smaller. BMW X4 is 2 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X4 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1400 litres | no data | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has more luggage space. BMW X4 has 25 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X4 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`335 kg | 2`300 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`745 kg | 1`660 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 590 kg | 640 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 25 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X4 has
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
| |