BMW X4 2014 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X4 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC60 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 - 360 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 630 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 8.1 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.6 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
|
BMW X4 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, BMW X4 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.71 m | |
| BMW X4 is 3 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X4 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | 1455 litres | |
| BMW X4 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 55 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X4 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`378 | ~ 2`401 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X4 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |