BMW X3 2014 vs BMW X3 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.6 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 2014 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X3 2014 engine produces 48 HP more power than BMW X3 2010, whereas torque is 90 NM more than BMW X3 2010. Thanks to more power BMW X3 2014 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 2014 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X3 2014 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3 2010, which means that by driving the BMW X3 2014 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X3 2014 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 2014 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X6 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 2010 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X3 2014 3.0 engine: Using poor quality oil on this engine will quickly lead to soot build-up, resulting in damage to the hydrocompensators, Vanos and Valvetronic systems. BMW X3 2010 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW X3 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X3 2014 and BMW X3 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 2014 is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW X3 2010. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`405 | 2`305 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | BMW X3 2014 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X3 2010 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than BMW X3 2014, so BMW X3 2014 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
BMW X3 has
| |