BMW X3 2014 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X3 engine produces 50 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Thanks to more power BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.6 | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the BMW X3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | Used also on Jeep Renegade | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW X3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X3 is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 412 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | no data | |
|
BMW X3 has more luggage capacity. BMW X3 has 138 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`365 | 2`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |