BMW X3 2014 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X3 engine produces 40 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW X3 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the BMW X3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
|
BMW X3 is larger, but slightly lower. BMW X3 is 2 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 9 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | no data | |
|
BMW X3 has more luggage capacity. BMW X3 has 71 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means BMW X3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`365 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |