BMW X3 2011 vs Volvo XC60 2008

 
BMW X3
2011 - 2014
Volvo XC60
2008 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 250 HP285 HP
Torque: 560 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 seconds7.5 seconds
BMW X3 is more dynamic to drive.
BMW X3 engine produces 35 HP less power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 160 NM more than Volvo XC60. Despite less power, BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.011.9
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
BMW X3 consumes 5.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the BMW X3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 885 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 67 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle580 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway780 km on highway
BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.63 m
Width: 1.88 m1.89 m
Height: 1.66 m1.71 m
BMW X3 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW X3 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1455 litres
BMW X3 has more luggage capacity.
BMW X3 has 55 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60.
Turning diameter: no data11.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`440
Safety:
Quality:
above average

above average
Volvo XC60 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW X3, so Volvo XC60 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 13 2009400
Pros and Cons: BMW X3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Volvo XC60 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv