BMW X3 2010 vs BMW X3 2006

 
BMW X3
2010 - 2012
BMW X3
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol3.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 258 HP272 HP
Torque: 310 NM315 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 seconds7.5 seconds
BMW X3 2010 engine produces 14 HP less power than BMW X3 2006, whereas torque is 5 NM less than BMW X3 2006. Despite less power, BMW X3 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.09.7
Real fuel consumption: 11.1 l/100km12.3 l/100km
The BMW X3 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW X3 2010 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3 2006, which means that by driving the BMW X3 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X3 2010 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3 2006.
Fuel tank capacity: 67 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway880 km on highway
600 km with real consumption540 km with real consumption
BMW X3 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 212 mm (8.3 inches)201 mm (7.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 2010 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km380'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 7 years7 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.57 m
Width: 1.88 m1.85 m
Height: 1.66 m1.67 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW X3 2010 is 8 cm longer than the BMW X3 2006, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1600 litres1560 litres
BMW X3 2010 has more luggage capacity.
BMW X3 2010 has 70 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3 2006. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 2010 (by 40 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the BMW X3 2010 is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW X3 2006.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3052`300
Safety:
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 13 2006800
Pros and Cons: BMW X3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
BMW X3 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv