BMW X3 2010 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X3 engine produces 11 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X3 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the BMW X3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X3 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X3 2010 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW X3 2010 2.0 engine Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
|
BMW X3 is larger, but slightly lower. BMW X3 is 1 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 9 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1773 litres | |
| BMW X3 has 71 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 173 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| BMW X3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than BMW X3, so BMW X3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |