BMW X3 2010 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2013

 
BMW X3
2010 - 2014
Chevrolet Captiva
2013 - 2014
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 184 HP184 HP
Torque: 380 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds11 seconds
BMW X3 and Chevrolet Captiva have the same engine power, but BMW X3 torque is 20 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva. BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.67.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km10.9 l/100km
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW X3 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the BMW X3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X3 consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva.
Fuel tank capacity: 67 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1190 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
1260 km on highway1000 km on highway
900 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 212 mm (8.3 inches)200 mm (7.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 17 years14 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1Used also on Opel Antara
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.67 m
Width: 1.88 m1.85 m
Height: 1.66 m1.76 m
BMW X3 is 3 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 3 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 10 cm lower.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: 550 litres97 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data97 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 550 litres477 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1600 litres1577 litres
In 5-seat version BMW X3 has more luggage space (by 73 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 23 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters12.3 meters
The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means BMW X3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3002`505
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

low
BMW X3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than BMW X3, so BMW X3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 13 0008600
Pros and Cons: BMW X3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Chevrolet Captiva has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv