BMW X3 2006 vs Opel Antara 2011

 
BMW X3
2006 - 2010
Opel Antara
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 286 HP163 HP
Torque: 580 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.6 seconds9.9 seconds
BMW X3 is more dynamic to drive.
BMW X3 engine produces 123 HP more power than Opel Antara, whereas torque is 230 NM more than Opel Antara. Thanks to more power BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.86.3
Real fuel consumption: 9.8 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Opel Antara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW X3 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X3 could require 225 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X3 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara.
Fuel tank capacity: 67 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle1030 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1250 km on highway
680 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption
Opel Antara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 12 years14 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6Used also on Chevrolet Captiva
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.60 m
Width: 1.85 m1.85 m
Height: 1.67 m1.76 m
BMW X3 is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Antara, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW X3 is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres419 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1560 litresno data
BMW X3 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, BMW X3 has 61 litres more trunk space than the Opel Antara. The Opel Antara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 12 meters12.3 meters
The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Opel Antara.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3852`505
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 68008000
Pros and Cons: BMW X3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Opel Antara has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv