BMW X3 2006 vs BMW X5 2003

 
BMW X3
2006 - 2010
BMW X5
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Petrol3.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 218 HP231 HP
Torque: 250 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds8.3 seconds
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving.
BMW X3 engine produces 13 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 50 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.313.0
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
BMW X3 consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that by driving the BMW X3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 67 litres93 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway950 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 201 mm (7.9 inches)203 mm (8 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW Z4Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW Z4
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.67 m
Width: 1.85 m1.87 m
Height: 1.67 m1.72 m
BMW X3 is smaller.
BMW X3 is 10 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X3 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres465 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1560 litres1550 litres
Even though the car is shorter, BMW X3 has 15 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 10 litres).
Turning diameter: 12 meters12 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`2602`595
Safety:
Quality:
above average

below average
BMW X3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than BMW X3, so BMW X3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 68005400
Pros and Cons: BMW X3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
BMW X5 has
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv