BMW X3 2006 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. BMW X3 engine produces 50 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X3 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X3 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X3 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1, BMW Z4 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Volkswagen Scirocco | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
|
BMW X3 is larger, but slightly lower. BMW X3 is 14 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 4 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1560 litres | 1510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`200 kg | 2`210 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`655 kg | 1`578 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 545 kg | 632 kg | |
| BMW X3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Therefore, Volkswagen Tiguan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| BMW X3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than BMW X3, so BMW X3 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |