BMW X3 2006 vs Peugeot 4007 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| BMW X3 engine produces 6 HP less power than Peugeot 4007, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Peugeot 4007. Due to the lower power, BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 4007 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on BMW 3 sērija | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X3 2006 2.0 engine: The BMW M47D20TU is a 2.0-liter diesel engine generally regarded as a durable unit capable of covering more than 400,000 km with proper maintenance. It uses a timing chain drive positioned at the front of the engine, which simplifies servicing compared with some later BMW diesels. The fuel system and overall ... More about BMW X3 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| BMW X3 is 7 cm shorter than the Peugeot 4007, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1560 litres | 1686 litres | |
|
Peugeot 4007 has more luggage space. BMW X3 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 4007. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 4007 (by 126 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`265 kg | 2`410 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`745 kg | 1`790 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 520 kg | 620 kg | |
| BMW X3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Peugeot 4007. Therefore, Peugeot 4007 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Peugeot 4007 has
| |