BMW X3 2004 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X3 engine produces 71 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 87 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.7 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X3 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X3 could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X3 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW Z4 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW X3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
|
BMW X3 is larger. BMW X3 is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 10 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1560 litres | 1705 litres | |
| BMW X3 has 78 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 145 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means BMW X3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |