BMW X3 2004 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW X3 engine produces 64 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X3 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X3 could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X3 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X3 2004 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering ... More about BMW X3 2004 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| BMW X3 is 8 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 5 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1560 litres | 1691 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. BMW X3 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 131 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means BMW X3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`355 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X3 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |