BMW X3 2004 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW X3 engine produces 30 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 10.1 | |
| BMW X3 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X3 could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW Z4 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW X3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
|
BMW X3 is larger, but slightly lower. BMW X3 is 2 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1560 litres | 952 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, BMW X3 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the BMW X3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 608 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X3 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |