BMW X3 2025 vs Peugeot 5008 2025
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X3 engine produces 54 HP more power than Peugeot 5008, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Peugeot 5008. Thanks to more power BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 5.9 | |
|
The Peugeot 5008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X3 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 5008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X3 could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| Peugeot 5008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 5008) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW X3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this BMW X3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of BMW X3 2025 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X3 is 4 cm shorter than the Peugeot 5008, 3 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | 259 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 259 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 570 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1700 litres | 1815 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 5008 (by 115 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 5008, which means BMW X3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`425 kg | 2`330 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`780 kg | 1`625 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 645 kg | 705 kg | |
| BMW X3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem less than Peugeot 5008. Therefore, Peugeot 5008 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Peugeot 5008 has
| |