BMW X3 2025 vs Citroen C5 Aircross 2025
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X3 engine produces 54 HP more power than Citroen C5 Aircross, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Citroen C5 Aircross. Thanks to more power BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 5.6 | |
|
The Citroen C5 Aircross is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X3 consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5 Aircross, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X3 could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C5 Aircross gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen C5 Aircross) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW X3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
|
BMW X3 is larger, but slightly lower. BMW X3 is 11 cm longer than the Citroen C5 Aircross, 5 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | 565 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1700 litres | 1668 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`425 kg | 2`100 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`780 kg | 1`554 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 645 kg | 546 kg | |
| BMW X3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Citroen C5 Aircross. Therefore, BMW X3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has
| |