BMW X3 2025 vs Chevrolet Trax 2022
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 139 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 219 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW X3 engine produces 51 HP more power than Chevrolet Trax, whereas torque is 91 NM more than Chevrolet Trax. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Trax) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW X3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this BMW X3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of BMW X3 2025 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.56 m | |
|
BMW X3 is larger. BMW X3 is 22 cm longer than the Chevrolet Trax, 10 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | 725 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1700 litres | 1532 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the BMW X3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 168 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`425 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |