BMW X3 2021 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2021

 
BMW X3
2021 - 2024
Skoda Kodiaq
2021 - 2023
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 190 HP200 HP
Torque: 400 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 secondsn/a seconds
BMW X3 engine produces 10 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.56.6
BMW X3 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq, which means that by driving the BMW X3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1040 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW X3 2021 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ...  More about BMW X3 2021 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.70 m
Width: 1.90 m1.88 m
Height: 1.68 m1.69 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW X3 is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Kodiaq, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres835 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1600 litres2065 litres
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the BMW X3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 465 litres).
Turning diameter: 12 meters12.2 meters
The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Kodiaq.
Gross weight: 2`500 kg2`410 kg
Net weight:1`840 kg1`690 kg
Load capacity:660 kg720 kg
BMW X3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem less than Skoda Kodiaq. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 43 40027 600
Pros and Cons: BMW X3 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Skoda Kodiaq has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv