BMW X3 2021 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW X3 engine produces 10 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X3 2021 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X3 2021 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X3 is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Kodiaq, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 835 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1600 litres | 2065 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the BMW X3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 465 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Kodiaq. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`500 kg | 2`410 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`840 kg | 1`690 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 660 kg | 720 kg | |
| BMW X3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem less than Skoda Kodiaq. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 400 | 28 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |