Skoda Kodiaq is a more dynamic driving. BMW X3 engine produces 50 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Skoda Kodiaq. Due to the lower power, BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
6.5
6.4
BMW X3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X3 could require 15 litres more fuel.
BMW X3 2021 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X3 2021 2.0 engine
Dimensions
Length:
4.71 m
4.70 m
Width:
1.90 m
1.88 m
Height:
1.68 m
1.69 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW X3 is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Kodiaq, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity:
550 litres
725 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible
1600 litres
1960 litres
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the BMW X3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 360 litres).
Turning diameter:
12 meters
12.2 meters
The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Kodiaq.
