BMW X3 2021 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Hybrid | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. BMW X3 engine produces 136 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.6 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X3 consumes 5.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the BMW X3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 765 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X3 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | no data | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| BMW X3 is 3 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 10 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1500 litres | 1432 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the BMW X3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 68 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means BMW X3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`600 kg | 2`490 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`990 kg | 1`941 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 610 kg | 549 kg | |
| BMW X3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Volvo XC60. Therefore, BMW X3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 41 800 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |