BMW X3 2017 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2019

 
BMW X3
2017 - 2021
Skoda Kodiaq
2019 - 2021
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 252 HP190 HP
Torque: 350 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.3 seconds7.5 seconds
BMW X3 is more dynamic to drive.
BMW X3 engine produces 62 HP more power than Skoda Kodiaq, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Skoda Kodiaq. Thanks to more power BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data6.9
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres60 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ...  More about BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.70 m
Width: 1.89 m1.88 m
Height: 1.68 m1.69 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW X3 is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Kodiaq, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres650 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1600 litres2065 litres
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the BMW X3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 465 litres).
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Kodiaq, which means BMW X3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`385 kg2`320 kg
Net weight:1`790 kg1`628 kg
Load capacity:595 kg692 kg
BMW X3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Skoda Kodiaq. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 23 60019 600
Pros and Cons: BMW X3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Skoda Kodiaq has
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv