BMW X3 2017 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2018

	BMW X3 2017 - 2021	Skoda Kodiaq 2018 - 2021
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	2.0 Petrol	2.0 Petrol
Performance
Power:	252 HP	220 HP
Torque:	350 NM	350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	6.3 seconds	7.5 seconds
	BMW X3 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X3 engine produces 32 HP more power than Skoda Kodiaq, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	no data	8.0
Fuel tank capacity:	65 litres	62 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type
Wheel drive type:	All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)	All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine
Dimensions
Length:	4.71 m	4.63 m
Width:	1.89 m	1.88 m
Height:	1.68 m	1.69 m
	Both cars are similar in size. BMW X3 is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Kodiaq, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity:	550 litres	463 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	1600 litres	1607 litres
	BMW X3 has 87 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Kodiaq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 7 litres).
Turning diameter:	12 meters	no data
Gross weight (kg):	2`385	no data

Safety:		no data
Quality:	average	no data
Average price (€):	25 400	19 800
Pros and Cons:	BMW X3 has more power more dynamic roomier boot	Skoda Kodiaq has lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

BMW X3 2017 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2018

Performance

Fuel consumption

Drive type

Dimensions