BMW X3 2017 vs BMW X3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 360 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 seconds | 5.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 2017 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X3 2017 engine produces 54 HP more power than BMW X3 2014, whereas torque is 100 NM more than BMW X3 2014. Thanks to more power BMW X3 2017 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW X3 2017 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3 2014, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X3 2017 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X3 2017 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3 2014. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X3 2014 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 4 sērija, BMW X4 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 2014 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X3 2017 3.0 engine: The B58 engine, compared to its predecessor, features a 20% increase in boost pressure, a closed-deck cylinder block design, an increased compression ratio of 11.0:1, and a slightly larger displacement of 2998 cc, up from 2979 cc, with an additional weight of 8 kg. Despite its advancements, the engine has several common ... More about BMW X3 2017 3.0 engine BMW X3 2014 3.0 engine: Using poor quality oil on this engine will quickly lead to soot build-up, resulting in damage to the hydrocompensators, Vanos and Valvetronic systems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X3 2017 is 6 cm longer than the BMW X3 2014, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 2017 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 2017 is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW X3 2014. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`455 | 2`405 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
BMW X3 has
| |