BMW X3 2017 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW X3 engine produces 10 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.6 | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X3 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq, which means that by driving the BMW X3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1580 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X3 and Skoda Kodiaq are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 835 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 2065 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space. BMW X3 has 285 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kodiaq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 465 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Kodiaq. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`420 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 400 | 29 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |