BMW X3 2017 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (BMW X3) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Outlander) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X3 engine produces 40 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 205 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 8.7 | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X3 consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the BMW X3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
|
BMW X3 is larger, but slightly lower. BMW X3 is 1 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 9 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 519 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 519 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means BMW X3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`420 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 000 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |