BMW X3 2017 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X3 engine produces 10 HP more power than Jaguar F-Pace, but torque is 30 NM less than Jaguar F-Pace. Thanks to more power BMW X3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW X3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X3 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X3 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1580 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 6 sērija, BMW X4 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar F-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
BMW X3 is smaller, but slightly higher. BMW X3 is 2 cm shorter than the Jaguar F-Pace, 18 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 650 litres | |
|
BMW X3 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, BMW X3 has 42 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. The Jaguar F-Pace may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 950 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`420 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar F-Pace scores higher in safety tests. The Jaguar F-Pace scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |