BMW X3 2017 vs BMW X3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
| BMW X3 2017 and BMW X3 2014 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. BMW X3 2017 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 2017 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW X3 2017 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3 2014, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X3 2017 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X3 2017 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3 2014. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1580 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 6 sērija, BMW X4 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 2014 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X3 2017 is 5 cm longer than the BMW X3 2014, 1 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 2017 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 2017 is 0.1 metres more than that of the BMW X3 2014. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`420 | 2`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 28 600 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
BMW X3 has
| |