BMW X3 2010 vs BMW X3 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW X3
2010 - 2014
BMW X3
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW X3 2010 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X3 2006 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW X3 2010 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.02.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 143 - 313 HP143 - 286 HP
Torque: 270 - 630 NM200 - 580 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.7 - 10.3 seconds6.6 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.1 - 9.06.2 - 10.0
BMW X3 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW X3 2006. On average, BMW X3 2010 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3 2006.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 212 mm (8.3 inches)201 mm (7.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 2010 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.57 m
Width: 1.88 m1.85 m
Height: 1.66 m1.67 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW X3 2010 is 8 cm longer than the BMW X3 2006, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1600 litres1560 litres
BMW X3 2010 has more luggage capacity.
BMW X3 2010 has 70 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3 2006. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 2010 (by 40 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the BMW X3 2010 is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW X3 2006.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`315~ 2`289
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 13 0006800
Pros and Cons: BMW X3 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
BMW X3 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv