BMW X3 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X3 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Honda CR-V also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 286 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 580 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 - 12 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| In general, BMW X3 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 10.0 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
BMW X3 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, BMW X3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 175 - 185 mm (6.9 - 7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X3 is 5 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1560 litres | 1532 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the BMW X3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 28 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`289 kg | ~ 2`098 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`754 kg | ~ 1`556 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 535 kg | ~ 542 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |