BMW X3 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 286 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 580 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 - 12 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 10.0 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
BMW X3 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, BMW X3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X3 is 5 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1560 litres | 955 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, BMW X3 has 76 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the BMW X3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 605 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`289 | ~ 2`105 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CR-V has
| |