BMW X3 2004 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 231 HP | 140 - 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 500 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 12 seconds | 10.6 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 12.0 | 6.7 - 10.1 | |
|
BMW X3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, BMW X3 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
| BMW X3 is 5 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1560 litres | 952 litres | |
| BMW X3 has 47 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 608 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means BMW X3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`292 | ~ 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CR-V has
| |