BMW X3 2024 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2024
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X3 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Kodiaq can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW X3 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 3.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 381 HP | 150 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 - 650 NM | 250 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 - 8.4 seconds | 6.3 - 9.9 seconds | |
| In general, BMW X3 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Skoda Kodiaq. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.1 - 8.3 | 5.9 - 8.6 | |
|
BMW X3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Kodiaq. On average, BMW X3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
| BMW X3 and Skoda Kodiaq are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | 910 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1700 litres | 2105 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space. BMW X3 has 340 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kodiaq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 405 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`559 kg | ~ 2`353 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 62 200 | 38 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |