BMW X3 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
BMW X3 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Nissan Qashqai has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
BMW X3 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Qashqai can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan Qashqai also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.2 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 184 - 382 HP | 110 - 163 HP | |
Torque: | 290 - 700 NM | 165 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 8.3 seconds | 8.9 - 13 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 10.2 | 3.8 - 5.8 | |
BMW X3 petrol engines consumes on average 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, BMW X3 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 180 - 182 mm (7.1 - 7.2 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.71 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.59 m | |
BMW X3 is larger. BMW X3 is 32 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 9 cm wider, while the height of BMW X3 is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1598 litres | |
BMW X3 has more luggage capacity. BMW X3 has 120 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 2 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW X3 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means BMW X3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`486 | ~ 1`953 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 29 000 | 16 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW X3 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |